Now, the most annoying thing about Reed is HOW he reviews films. He talks like if he were doing a commercial. He says several adjectives in several sentences, many times at the rate of one short sentence per adjective, other times cramming as many adjectives as possible in one long sentence. They're pretty undescriptive, as he never says WHY the film deserves such adjectives. He never really enters to analyze a film. The few times he does so, you wish he had stuck to the adjectives...
The second most annoying thing of Reed is that he only praises movies that fall into some typical Hollywood type. Any movie that takes risks is immediately trashed by him. Particularly if there is more than one idea involved, or if the plot per se is secondary to other elements that the film is really centered on. For example, the ever changing Being John Malkovich got called by him "an exasperatingly precocious one-joke idea that collapses after the first 20 minutes and drags on numbingly, substituting conceit for substance." He's also not kind to movies made by people who are not famous. And he hates movies that are overall dark, as he finds them unrealistic. Finally, he gives the most annoying titles possible to his reviews. For a recent example, his review of Bringing Out the Dead was titled "Hee-Haw Goes Hollywood".
Currently he works at the New York Observer. However, if you want to watch Mr. Star Critic in action, watch Myra Breckenridge, one of the worst movies ever made (enjoyed only by people who see it as a camp classic), which stars ol' Rex as a guy who has a sex change operation and becomes Raquel Welch. Heck, to annoy ol' Rex, here's a picture from that piece of garbage:
Note: he's not acting. He's an idiot in real life too.
P.M.-